An Approach to Measure the Pedagogy in Slides with Voice-Over Type Instructional Videos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.4.2314Keywords:
Pedagogy, Pedagogical Principles, Pedagogical Analysis, Instructional Videos, Online LearningAbstract
: E-learning provides a more suitable learning environment for educators and learners. Hence, the e-learning community has rapidly increased over the years. At present, e-learning environments use several materials to transfer knowledge to learners. Out of various types of materials, instructional videos have become the prominent source of information in popular e-learning environments. Instructional videos in e-learning can be categorised into many types based on the content presentation method. Voice-over slides are popular instructional videos at present. Since the instructional materials are a key component of an e-learning environment, maintaining the required quality of these materials is vital. Using proper pedagogy in instructional materials mainly enhances the quality. There are many pedagogical principles proposed over the years, and these principles address different features of all instructional materials. Therefore, it is necessary to derive the applicable pedagogical principles based on the features available in the instructional video to analyse the pedagogy in an instructional video. The investigation related to this paper aims to derive an approach to analysing and quantifying the pedagogy in slides with voice-over type instructional videos. In this study, a thorough literature review first identified the pedagogical principles applicable to slides with voice-over type instructional videos. Next, the prominence of the identified pedagogical principles was derived from a Likert-scale survey conducted by several Information Technology undergraduates. The survey response assigned a rank to each identified pedagogical principle. The rank was derived by the mean score obtained for each pedagogical principle. Next, one-way ANOVA tests were performed for the mean score of pedagogical principles to derive their prominence levels. The ANOVA tests were conducted by adding adjacent pedagogical principles with a non-identical rank until the ANOVA results claimed a significant difference in variances. A new level was defined when the ANOVA results showed a significant difference. This study proposed a pedagogical score calculation formula using these levels (derived from the statistical analysis) to derive a qualitative measure of the use of pedagogy in slides with voice-over type instructional videos. The pedagogical evaluators and content developers can use the proposed scoring method to quantify and compare the pedagogy in slides with voice-over instructional videos.
References
Agarwal, S. and Kaushik, J. S. (2020) ‘Student’s Perception of Online Learning during COVID Pandemic’, Indian Journal of Pediatrics. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 87(7), p. 554. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03327-7.
Al-fraihat, D., Joy, M. and Sinclair, J. (2020) ‘Computers in Human Behavior Evaluating E-learning systems success : An empirical study’, Computers in Human Behavior. Elsevier, 102(June 2019), pp. 67–86. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004.
Asanthika Imbulpitiya, Nuwan Kodagoda, Anjalie Gamage, and K. S. (2019) Using Active Learning Integrated with Pedagogical Aspects to Enhance Student’s Learning Experience in Programming and Related Concepts. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7.
Berk, R. A. (2009) ‘Multimedia Teaching with Video Clips : TV , Movies , YouTube , and mtvU in the College Classroom’, International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(1), pp. 1–21.
Bhowmik, M., Roy, B. B. and Banerjee, J. (2013) ‘Role of Pedagogy in Effective Teaching’, 2(January), pp. 1–5.
Brame, C. J. (2016) ‘Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content’, CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), p. es6.1-es6.6. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125.
Brecht, H. D. (2012) ‘Learning from Online Video Lectures’, Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, pp. 227–250. doi: 10.28945/1712.
Chen, H. T. M. and Thomas, M. (2020) ‘Effects of lecture video styles on engagement and learning’, Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), pp. 2147–2164. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09757-6.
Docebo (2016) ‘Elearning market trends and forecast 2017-2021’, Docebo, pp. 34–36.
Gagne, R. M. and Wager, W. W. (1992) ‘Principles of Instructional Design (4th ed.)’, Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers., p. 153.
Gleason, B. (2021) ‘Expanding interaction in online courses: integrating critical humanizing pedagogy for learner success’, Educational Technology Research and Development. Springer US, 69(1), pp. 51–54. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09888-w.
Govindasamy, T. (2001) ‘Successful implementation of e-Learning Pedagogical considerations’, Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), pp. 287–299. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00071-9.
Hansch, A. et al. (2015) ‘Video and Online Learning: Critical Reflections and Findings from the Field’, HIIG Discussion Paper Series, 2. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2577882.
Hayashi, A., Chen, C. and Ryan, T. (no date) ‘The Role of Social Presence and Moderating Role of Computer Self Efficacy in Predicting the Continuance Usage of E-Learning Systems’, Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), pp. 139–155.
Hubackova, S. (2014) ‘Pedagogical Foundation of Elearning’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier B.V., 131(2004), pp. 24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.073.
Javier, S. et al. (2020) ‘Examining the use of instructional video clips for teaching macroeconomics’, Computers & Education journal, 144(June 2019). doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103709.
Kruskal, W. H. and Wallis, W. A. (1952) ‘Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), pp. 583–621. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441.
Li, C. (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how, World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/.
Lin, L. and Johnson, T. (2021) ‘Shifting to digital: informing the rapid development, deployment, and future of teaching and learning: Introduction’, Educational Technology Research and Development. Springer US, 69(1), pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1007/s11423-021-09960-z.
Materials, H. Q. et al. (2006) ‘Ensuring the Effectiveness and Quality of Learning Materials : How to Use and Evaluate Literacy / CE Materials’, Regional Center for Educational Innovation and Technology.
Mayer, R. E. (2009a) Multimedia Learning. Second Edi, Multimedia Learning. Second Edi. Santa Barbara: Cambridge University. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139164603.
Mayer, R. E. (2009b) ‘Research- ‐ Based Principles for Designing Multimedia Instruction Overview of Multimedia Instruction’.
Mayer, R. E. and Moreno, R. (2002) ‘Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning’, Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), pp. 87–99.
van der Meij, H. and van der Meij, J. (2013) ‘Eight Guidelines for the Design of Instructional Videos for Software Training’, Technical Communication, 60(3), pp. 205–228. doi: 10.1080/10572252.2012.626690; Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity (1999) Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (2), pp. 358-368; Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages (2000) Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (4), pp. 724-733; Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments (2004) Journal of Educationa.
Mendoza, G. L. L., Caranto, L. C. and David, J. J. T. (2015) ‘Effectiveness of Video Presentation to Students’ Learning’, International Journal of Nursing Science, 5(2), pp. 81–86. doi: 10.5923/j.nursing.20150502.07.
Mukti, M. a. et al. (2000) ‘A pedagogical approach to multimedia courseware development tonmotivate reading habit’, 2000 TENCON Proceedings. Intelligent Systems and Technologies for the New Millennium (Cat. No.00CH37119), 1, pp. 134–139. doi: 10.1109/TENCON.2000.893557.
Results, I. D. and Evidence, D. A. (2018) ‘Office of Online Learning Online Course Design Checklist Stage 2 : Determine Acceptable Evidence Stage 3 : Plan the Learning Experience’, MSUM Online, pp. 9–11.
Seale, J. and Cooper, M. (2010) ‘E-learning and accessibility: An exploration of the potential role of generic pedagogical tools’, Computers and Education. Elsevier Ltd, 54(4), pp. 1107–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.017.
Sirisuriya, S. C. M. D. S. et al. (2018) ‘Significance of Interaction and Activities Factor in Pedagogical Evaluation Process of Web Based’, 2018 13th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE). IEEE, (Iccse), pp. 1–5.
Stemler, L. K. (1997) ‘Educational Characteristics of Multimedia : A Literature Review’, Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6, pp. 1–16.
Teoh, B. S. and Neo, T. (2007) ‘INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING : STUDENTS ’ ATTITUDES AND LEARNING IMPACT IN AN ANIMATION COURSE’, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(4).
Watson, S. (2005) ‘The Importance of the Pedagogy Process .’, Nebula, (June), pp. 141–152.
Welsh, E. T. et al. (2003) ‘E-learning : emerging uses , empirical results and future directions’, (December). doi: 10.1046/j.1360-3736.2003.00184.x.
Zhang, D. et al. (2004) ‘CLASSROOM’, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 47(5), pp. 74–79.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kushnara Suriyawansa, Nuwan Kodagoda, Lochandaka Ranathunga, Nor Aniza Binti Abdullah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access Publishing
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning operates an Open Access Policy. This means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, is that authors control the integrity of their work, which should be properly acknowledged and cited.
