Exploring Interdisciplinary Collaborative Online Learning Spaces through Sociomateriality in Cape Town, South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.4.2359Keywords:
Interdisciplinary learning, Collaborative online learning, Covid-19, Sociomateriality, Agency, Intra-action, EntanglementAbstract
With the rapid adoption of online learning spaces since the advent of COVID-19, more and more calls are being made in higher education to move from emergency remote teaching and learning to appropriate online education. Although much has been written about the designing of online learning from both a technological and pedagogical perspective, limited contemporary literature is available to understand the complexity of interdisciplinary collaborative online learning. This limitation is investigated in this paper that reports on the first iteration of a Design-Based Research (DBR) study. Within this iteration, a qualitative exploratory research design that applies an inductive approach between researchers from Information Systems (IS) and Urban Planning (URP) is discussed. The aim was to develop design principles for interdisciplinary collaborative online learning spaces. This paper reports on the data generated during a semester-long, inter-institutional, interdisciplinary student project that was embedded in co-creating social digital innovations for pressing environmental problems faced by marginalised communities in Cape Town, South Africa. The participants for this study are 38 Honours degree IS students and 22 Advanced Diploma URP students (N=60). Participants, individually and in groups, completed a total of three reflective structured questionnaires using Google Forms during the semester that generated the dataset for this paper. The theoretical framing that underpins this research study is sociomateriality. The attraction to sociomateriality is its ability to not merely shift attention from the human to the non-human but rather a focus on entanglements and the interrelated nature of components that constitute the learning space. This focus on entanglements is needed for an understanding of the complexities associated with interdisciplinary collaborative online learning. Engaging this complex learning space through the data has revealed four design principles namely: (1) creating immersive context-sensitive learning experiences, (2) designing opportunities to collaboratively (co)-construct knowledge, (3) focusing on the intra-action of socio-technical and socio-cultural entanglements and (4) foregrounding relationality as a tool to foster agency. It is argued in this paper that the aforementioned design principles are necessary for developing interdisciplinary collaborative online learning spaces that afford students a complex learning experience. Complex learning is considered fundamental in developing abilities in students to appropriately respond to the myriad 21st-century societal challenges that await.
References
Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham & London: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.
Barad, K. (2017) ‘Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: re-turning, re-membering, and facing the incalculable’, New Formations, 92, pp. 56–86. doi: 10.3898/NEWF.
Bernstein, J. H. (2015) ‘Transdisciplinarity: A Review of Its Origins, Development, and Current Issues’, Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), pp. 1–20. Available at: http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/510/412.
Brown, T. (2008) ‘Design thinking.’, Harvard Business Review, June, pp. 1–5. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22544412.
Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. et al. (2014) ‘Introduction to special issue: The sociomateriality of information systems: current status, future directions’, MIS Quarterly, 38(3), pp. 809–830.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy?. London: Verso.
Dorst, K. (2018) ‘Mixing Practices to Create Transdisciplinary Innovation: A Design-Based Approach’, Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(8), pp. 60–65. doi: 10.22215/timreview/1179.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R. and Sawchuk, P. (2011) Emerging Approaches to Educational Research. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Fenwick, T., Jensen, K. and Nerland, M. (2012) ‘Sociomaterial Approaches to Conceptualising Professional Learning, Knowledge and Practice an introduction to a special issue of’, Journal of Education and Work (February).
Gherardi, S. (2017) ‘Sociomateriality in Posthuman Practice Theory’, in Schatzki, T. (ed.) The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, and Practitioners. New York and London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 38–51.
Gourlay, L. and Oliver, M. (2018) Student Engagement in the Digital University. New York and London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Hayles, K. (2017) Unthought The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Hultin, L. (2019) ‘On becoming a sociomaterial researcher: Exploring epistemological practices grounded in a relational, performative ontology’, Information and Organization, 29(2), pp. 91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.004.
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P. & Bristol, L. (2014) Changing Practices, Changing Education. Singapore: Springer.
Kroeze, J. H., Travica, B. and van Zyl, I. (2019) ‘Information Systems in a Transdisciplinary Perspective: Leaping to a Larger Stage’, Alternation: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of the Arts and Humanities in Southern Africa, Sp24(August 2014), pp. 9–47. doi: 10.29086/2519-5476/2019/sp24.2a2.
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawrence, R. J. (2010) ‘Deciphering Interdisciplinary and Transdiciplinary Contributions’, Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1, pp. 111–116. doi: 10.22545/2010/0003.
Leibowitz, B. and Naidoo, K. (2017) ‘The potential for posthuman insights to effect socially just pedagogies’, Education as Change, 21(2), pp. 149–164. doi: 10.17159/1947-9417/2017/2020.
MacLure, M. (2010). The offence of theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25, pp. 277-286.
Moura, E. O. De and de Souza Bispo, M. (2020) ‘Sociomateriality: Theories, methodology, and practice’, Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 37, pp. 350–365. doi: 10.1002/cjas.1548.
Mousavi Baygi, R., Introna, L. D. and Hultin, L. (2021) ‘Everything Flows: Studying Continuious Socio-Technological Transformation in a Fluid and Dynamic Digital World’, MIS Quarterly, 45(1), pp. 423–452. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2021/15887.
Norris 2016 Norris, M., 2016. Ecocriticism and moral responsibility: the question of agency in Karen Barad's performativity theory. The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 49(1), pp.157-184.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007) ‘Essai Sociomaterial Practices : Exploring Technology at Work’. Organization Studies, 28(9), pp. 1435-1448. doi: 10.1177/0170840607081138.
Orlikowski, W. J. and Scott, S. V. (2008) ‘The entanglement of technology and work in organizations’, Working Paper Series, 44(0), pp. 0–46. Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/informationSystems/.
Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. 2016. Research methods for Business Students. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Scott, S. V and Orlikowski, W. J. (2013a) ‘Information and Organization Sociomateriality — taking the wrong turning ? A response to Mutch’, INFORG, 23(2), pp. 77–80. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.003.
Scott, S. V and Orlikowski, W. J. (2013b) ‘Sociomateriality-taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch’. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.003.
Scott, S. V and Orlikowski, W. J. (2014) ‘Entanglements in practice : performing anonymity through social media’, MIS Quarterly, 38(3), pp. 873–893.
St Pierre 2014 St Pierre, E. 2014. A brief and personal history of postqualitative research: towards post inquiry. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30, pp. 2-20.
Verlie, B. (2020) ‘From action to intra-action ? Agency , identity and “ goals ” in a relational approach to climate change education’, Environmental Education Research, 26(9–10), pp. 1266–1280. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2018.1497147.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) ‘Interaction between learning and development’, Mind and Society, pp. 79–91. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79572-3.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Carolien van den Berg, Belinda Verster
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access Publishing
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning operates an Open Access Policy. This means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, is that authors control the integrity of their work, which should be properly acknowledged and cited.