This is not (the New) Normal. Students' Attitudes Towards Studying During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Determinants of Academic Overload

Authors

  • Marko Radovan Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana
  • Danijela Makovec Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.3.2366

Keywords:

online learning, COVID-19, teaching methods, assessment, student attitudes

Abstract

The measures taken to combat the pandemic COVID -19 suddenly changed the way of studying in many countries around the world. Because of the abrupt change, faculties did not have time to develop strategies for implementing online study, so faculty were busy finding new ways to teach their courses. As it turned out, many of them were not prepared for such a change. They lacked the technical understanding of how to use online tools and platforms, as well as the pedagogical knowledge of the dynamics of online teaching. In this paper we discuss how students from the Faculty of Arts at the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, experienced the changes in the way they study. We conducted an anonymous online survey among 1,827 students from the largest faculty at the University of Ljubljana. The survey took place in February and March 2021. The results show that there were differences between students in their assessment of the appropriateness of different teaching approaches regarding various factors, which highlights the conditions students had at home to study. The conditions at home affected students' attitudes towards distance learning, their assessment of competence for distance learning, as well as their motivation to study and their sense of being overwhelmed. Thus, more study difficulties, negative attitudes and motivation problems were observed among students who were not provided with adequate study conditions. Nevertheless, the results of the study show that distance learning also has potential, but this potential can only be realised if all those involved in the process are provided with the right conditions. We conclude the study with four main recommendations, namely that the quality of distance learning requires (1) adequate conditions for students to participate in distance learning; (2) an appropriate choice of teaching methods is important; (3) teachers need to be didactically trained for distance learning; and (4) during distance learning, cooperation between the teacher and the students and between the students themselves should be encouraged.

References

Ashour, S. (2020) ‘How technology has shaped university students’ perceptions and expectations around higher education: an exploratory study of the United Arab Emirates’, Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), pp. 2513–2525. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1617683.

Bao, W. (2020) ‘COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University’, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), pp. 113–115. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.191.

Bates, T. (2015) Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Vancouver BC: Tony Bates Associates Ltd.

Choe, R. C. et al. (2019) ‘Student Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Asynchronous Online Lecture Videos’, CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), p. ar55. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-08-0171.

Colomo-Magaña, E. et al. (2020) ‘University Students’ Perception of the Usefulness of the Flipped Classroom Methodology’, Education Sciences, 10(10), p. 275. doi: 10.3390/educsci10100275.

Czerniewicz, L. et al. (2020) ‘A Wake-Up Call: Equity, Inequality and Covid-19 Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning’, Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), pp. 946–967. doi: 10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4.

Giannoulas, A. et al. (2021) ‘How Greek Students Experienced Online Education during Covid-19 Pandemic in Order to Adjust to a Post-Lockdown Period’, Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19(4), pp. pp222-232. doi: 10.34190/ejel.19.4.2347.

Gurajena, C., Mbunge, E. and Fashoto, S. (2021) Teaching and Learning in the New Normal: Opportunities and Challenges of Distance Learning Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3765509. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3765509.

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N. and Aston, R. (2015) ‘What works and why? Student perceptions of “useful” digital technology in university teaching and learning’, Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946.

Hodges, C. et al. (2020) The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning, EducauseReview. Available at: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (Accessed: 7 January 2021).

Jääskelä, P., Häkkinen, P. and Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017) ‘Teacher Beliefs Regarding Learning, Pedagogy, and the Use of Technology in Higher Education’, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), pp. 198–211. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2017.1343691.

Katz, V. S., Jordan, A. B. and Ognyanova, K. (2021) ‘Digital inequality, faculty communication, and remote learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of U.S. undergraduates’, PLOS ONE, 16(2), p. e0246641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246641.

Means, B., Bakia, M. and Murphy, R. (2014) Learning Online: What Research Tells Us about Whether, When and How. New York: Routledge.

Noetel, M. et al. (2021) ‘Video Improves Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review’, Review of Educational Research, 91(2), pp. 204–236. doi: 10.3102/0034654321990713.

O’Connell, T. S. and Dyment, J. E. (2016) ‘“I’m Just Not That Comfortable with Technology”: Student Perceptions of and Preferences for Web 2.0 Technologies in Reflective Journals’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(3), pp. 392–411. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2014.984594.

OECD (2020) Learning remotely when schools close: How well are students and schools prepared? Insight from PISA”, Tackling Coronavirus (COVID-19): Contributing to a Global Effort. OECD. Available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=127_127063-iiwm328658&title=Learning-remotely-when-schools-close.

Pajares, M. F. (1992) ‘Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct’, Review of Educational Research, 62(3), pp. 307–332. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003307.

Selwyn, N. (2014) Digital technology and the contemporary university: degrees of digitization. London ; New York: Routledge (Research into higher education).

Selwyn, N. (2016) ‘Digital downsides: exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology’, Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), pp. 1006–1021. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229.

Velde, R. van der et al. (2021) ‘“The idea is nice… but not for me”: First-year students’ readiness for large-scale “flipped lectures”—what (de)motivates them?’, Higher Education, 81(6), pp. 1157–1175. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00604-4.

Vlachopoulos, P. and Jan, S. (2020) ‘Exploring Modes of Lecturing as a Teaching Method in Higher Education: Student Attendance, Preference and Motivation’, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(5). Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1280563 (Accessed: 9 July 2021).

Wright, F. et al. (2014) ‘Visitors and Residents: mapping student attitudes to academic use of social networks’, Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), pp. 126–141. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.777077.

Downloads

Published

28 Mar 2022

Issue

Section

Articles