Digital Learning Process: Challenges for Specific Creativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.2.2107Keywords:
digital era, students, lecturers, creativity, thinking criticallyAbstract
Digital culture has penetrated most aspects of our lives. Yet it has also dragged us into paradoxical situations and profound uncertainty. This, in turn, requires digital learning process that is capable of fostering mature individuals characterized by specific creativity; the kind of creativity rooted in prudence, deep insight into life as well as broad and integrated personal vision of the world. This research aims to see the extent to which digital learning process is conducive to the fostering of this type of creativity. This is an exploratory research with qualitative approach, conducted by means of questionnaires, in-depth interview and focus group discussion. Gen-Y and Z students from 13 Universities in West Java, Indonesia, were chosen for observation and interview, continued with focus group discussion in two courses which are Critical Reading and Cultural Entrepreneurship classes. The result shows that the practice of online learning so far contains some inherent constraints to meet the need. Some basic constraints pertain to the condition of the students themselves. Despite the flaws, however, online learning process also has some good potentials in fostering the required creativity, provided it incorporates ‘engagement experience’ and some strategies to ‘go beyond data’ in accordance with the students’ suggestions themselves.
References
Adzima, K., (2020). Examining Online Cheating in Higher Education Using Traditional Classroom Cheating as a Guide. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(6), pp. 476-493
Alessio, H.M., Malay, N.J., Maurer, K.T., Bailer, A.J., and Rubin, B., 2017. Examining the effect of proctoring on online test scores. Online Learning, 21(1), pp.146-161.
Arnold, I., 2016. Cheating at online formative tests: does it pay off? The Internet and Higher Education, 29, pp.98–106.
Batmetan, J. R., and Palilingan, 2018. Higher Education Students’ Behavior to Adopt Mobile Learning. IOP Series: Material Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing Ltd.
Cabral, A.P., Huet, I., 2011. Research in Higher Education: The Role of Teaching and Student Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, pp. 91-97.
Cakrawati, L.M., (2017) “Students’ Perceptions on The Use of Online Learning Platforms in EFL Classroom” English Language Teaching and Technology Journal (ELT-Tech Journal), 1(1), pp. 22-30. URL: http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ELTTech/article/view/9428
Cooper, K., & Miness, A. M., 2014. The co-creation of caring student-teacher relationships: Does teacher understanding matter? High School Journal, 97(4), pp. 264-290.
Finn, A. N., Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., et. al., 2009. A metaanalytical review of teacher credibility and its associations with teacher behaviors and student outcomes. Communication Education, 58(4), pp. 516-537.
Goldman, Z., and Martin, M., 2016. Millennial students in the college classroom: Adjusting to academic entitlement. Communication Education, 65 (3), pp. 365-367.
Harari, Y. N., 2018. 21 Lessons for The 21st Century. London: Jonathan Cape.
Hard, S.F., Conway, J., and Moran, A.C., (2006). Faculty and college student beliefs about the frequency of student academic misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), pp.1058-1080.
Kleinhans, R., van Ham, M., Cowley, J.E., 2015. Using Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Engagement and Self-Organization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighborhood Governance. Planning Practice and Research, 30(3).
Knowles, E. dan Kerkman, D. (2007). An Investigation of Students Attitude and Motivation toward Online Learning. Student Motivation Journal: InSight: A Collection of Faculty Scholarship Park University, Volume 2, pp. 70-80.
Mamatah, R.S., 2016. Student’s Perception of E-Learning. Master Program of Adult Learning and Global Change, 60 credits. Linköping University |Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning. ISRN-number: LIU-IBL/IMPALGC-A—16/005-SE.
Mary, A., 2014. Student Learning Behavior and Academic Achievement: Unraveling its Relationship. Indian Journal of Applied Research, Social Science. ISSN No- 2249-555X.
Monaco, M., and Martin, M., 2007. The Millennial Student: A New Generation of Learners. Athletic Training Education Journal, pp. 42-46 42, © National Athletic Trainers’ Association, Inc.
Rickes, P. S., 2016. Generation in flux: How Gen Z will continue to transform higher education space. Planning for Higher Education Journal, 44(4).
Seemiller, C., and Grace, M., 2016. Generation Z goes to college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Shatto, B., & Erwin, K. (2017). Teaching Millennials and Generation Z: Bridging the generational divide. Creative Nursing, 23(1).
Sugiharto, I.B., 2018. Digital Society. Keynote Speech [at the] Innovative Learning Centre of Parahyangan Catholic University. Bandung.
Tosolt, B., 2010. Gender and race differences in middle school students' perceptions of caring teacher behaviors. Multicultural Perspectives, 12(3), pp. 145-151.
Underdahl, L., Daou, N., Gyamfi, G.D., et.al., 2013. Millennial University: Today’s Learners – Tomorrow Leader’s. The Exchange, 2(1). University of Phoenix.
Wong, B. T., 2017. Learning Analytics in Higher Education: An Analysis of Case Studies. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. Emerald Publishing Ltd.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Elvy Maria Manurung, Yohanes Slamet Purwadi, Prof., Ph. D.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access Publishing
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning operates an Open Access Policy. This means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, is that authors control the integrity of their work, which should be properly acknowledged and cited.