From Intention to Reflection: Understanding Self-Directed Learning in the Use of Generative AI in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.24.2.4505Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Generative AI, Theory of planned behavior, Self-directed learning, Reflective thinking, Higher education, PLS-SEMAbstract
This study extends the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to explore how students’ behavioral intentions toward using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) are associated with their reflective engagement and self-directed learning (SDL) in higher education. As GenAI tools such as ChatGPT increasingly mediate learning, understanding how learners’ intentions are linked to autonomous and reflective learning behaviors becomes essential. Data were collected from 149 first-year university students (predominantly female) in Vietnam who had prior experience with GenAI for academic purposes. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the study examined relationships among attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, behavioral intention, actual use, reflection, and two dimensions of SDL, including intentional learning and self-management. The results reveal that attitudes and perceived behavioral control significantly predict students’ intentions and actual use of GenAI, whereas subjective norms have no significant effect. Behavioral engagement is positively associated with reflection and both dimensions of SDL, while reflection is positively related to intentional learning and self-management, confirming its mediating role within the proposed model linking motivation-related constructs with autonomous learning outcomes. These findings highlight reflection as a metacognitive mechanism that links students’ behavioral engagement with GenAI and their SDL-related outcomes. Theoretically, the study advances TPB by positioning reflection and SDL as outcome constructs within the proposed model, rather than fixed learner traits. Practically, it suggests that educators and institutions working with first-year university students or similar learner populations should integrate reflective activities and AI literacy into curricula to promote critical, ethical, and autonomous engagement with GenAI. Designing learning environments that position AI as a reflective partner, rather than merely a content generator, supports learners’ self-regulation and reflective engagement. Overall, this research contributes to understanding how intentional and reflective interaction with GenAI is associated with deeper and more autonomous learning of students among first-year university students in a GenAI-supported learning context.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Diep-Ngoc Le, Trinh Thi Nguyen, Huong-Giang Thi Doan, An Dieu Trinh, Mai-Huong Dinh Pham

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access Publishing
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning operates an Open Access Policy. This means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, is that authors control the integrity of their work, which should be properly acknowledged and cited.